Section 1.8 Comparability Paragraph 1.8.2 Equivalence Methodology Policy Policy Statement: Supplement Not Supplant Under ESSA Purpose: ESEA section 1118(b)(1) requires that an LEA use the Title I, Part A funds it receives from its SEA only to supplement funds that would, in the absence of Title I, Part A funds, be made available from State and local sources for the education of students participating in a Title I program. Assurance: APA assures that it applies a consistent methodology for core funding and staff for schools prior to distributing or taking Title I, Part A funds into account. Any State and local funds that are retained at the LEA level will be used in a Title I neutral manner; and any Title I, Part A funds that are reserved at the LEA level will be used only for Title I, Part A purposes, as indicated in the LEA's approved ESSA Consolidated Federal Grant Application. Description of methodology: State and local funds are allocated by campus based on employee and non-employee related costs. The LEA allocated State and local resources for employee costs to each campus based on the LEA's staffing pattern. Non-employee resources are allocated on a per-pupil basis (campus enrollment multiplied by the LEA's per-pupil expenditure for non-personnel resources). The LEA applies this formula consistently to allocate State and local funds to all of its campuses. The table below represents the distribution of non-federal, non-supplemental funds by school within American Preparatory Academy's Utah campuses. Increased State and local distributions will be allocated to schools proportionally as shown.
Updated 11/2021
|